Just thinking about this as well, it definitely deserves to be standardised, at the moment there are several options
- nip39 style:
``` json
{
...
"kind": 30001 || >30000 && <39999,
"tags": [
["d", "Link list" ],
["avatar", "
" ],
["r", "https://github.com/gzuuus", "github"],
["r", "https://link2.com/gzuuus", "link2"],
["r", "https://link3.net", "link3"],
...
],
....
}
```
- Pinstr style:
``` json
{
...
"kind": 33888,
"tags": [
[ "d", "Best Tailwind Component Libraries" ],
[ "avatar", "" ],
[ "headers", "Name", "URL" ],
[ "pin", "Tailwind Elements", "https://tailwind-elements.com/" ],
[ "pin", "Flowbite", "https://flowbite.com/" ],
...
],
...
}
```
- Yakihonne style:
``` json
{
...
"kind": 30001,
"tags": [
[ "d", "eqwpJSUA8vEh1kjCoreAN" ],
[ "c", "curation" ],
[ "title", "Bitcoin Cultural Movement" ],
[ "excerpt", "The advent of Bitcoin ..." ],
[ "thumbnail", "
" ],
[ "a", "30023:8f014c5aafb425b2fa414a49eb9ab17269f155937db67a5babe7bc40f9bbae3b:aVcTJ7_S0U8QyB1e3bLPD", "" ],
[ "a", "30023:8f014c5aafb425b2fa414a49eb9ab17269f155937db67a5babe7bc40f9bbae3b:XLZbts-MILuP4eVw3tXli", "" ],
...
],
...
}
```
What do you think? From my point of view the ideal would be between nip39 style and yakihonne.
Yep, at the moment any bookmarks lists created outside of the platform do net get pulled into their “Curations” tab, even though they use the 30001 events for this. I’ve just created a list of all of my #Nostr Guides articles and it’s not displayed as my curated list 😞
Would love this to be available across the board - curations introduced by Yakihonne is a great feature 🔥
nostr: naddr1qqxyummnw3ezq3m4d9jx2uczypl4c26wfzswnlk2vwjxky7dhqjgnaqzqwvdvz3qwz5k3j4grrt46qcyqqq82vg0v9a3t
Maybe there are some sort of validation/approval from yakihonne to appear on their curated lis
Hey sir, there is no validation no approval for the curations, everyone is free to curate content the way the want
we are just pulling Curations for the yakihonne relay at the moment which is wss://nostr-01.yakihonne.com. Phases for pulling from other relays requires standarization so that the REQs won't be rejected. It still under discussion under PR#492 were several suggestions are made. After all, we still in early stages
