The idea that "stealing" relics from "indigenous peoples" is bad is one of the most retarded anti-White slanders this society has ever conjured, what were those "indigenous peoples" doing with those artifacts before then? Just letting them sit in ancient ruins? Why? Because they didn't even know they were there and didn't care, and if they did they would probably just melt them down for scrap and sell them. You can't tell me that the same people who fill their rivers with trash and are currently clear cutting the Amazon Rainforest really, earnestly care about what's in some dusty ass ruins just because some jewish college professor in New York said so without actually talking to any of them.
Discussion
From the bits I’ve come into contact to the natives always want relics because they know whitey wants them, ergo they have value. Usually it’s a bartering chip for their government, the smarter ones know how to do that.
I drank w/ a dude who was privy to a museum in SA trying to needle the US into giving them money for a new building because they said their old shithole was dangerous to their collections. They needed 50 million for a new one with climate control and beautiful edifices in order to show off their beautiful mate cups and knitted loincloths
Also they steal the relics from each other. I've been reading about Mesopotamia lately and I've read of a few instances of relics being ransacked or destroyed by other locals of the area, even after they are put into museums. Hell they've been doing that since the artifacts were made.