Here's your summary from Mark Levin: This is 'election interference' (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqoC3rPhock) on the Fox News channel:
**TLDR:** The video discusses a case in Manhattan where a former president is facing 34 charges, including alleged violations of federal election laws. The judge questions the timing of the case, lack of jurisdiction, and overcharging by the prosecutor.
- The case in Manhattan involves a former president facing 34 charges, including alleged violations of federal election laws.
- The judge questions the timing of the case, as it was brought in the middle of an election, and the expired statute of limitations.
- The prosecutor is accused of overcharging by breaking the case into 34 individual charges when there may only be one or two valid charges.
- The prosecutor lacks jurisdiction to make allegations about federal election laws, as there have been no charges or adjudications at the federal level.
- The judge highlights the importance of due process, the Bill of Rights, and upholding the Constitution in the courtroom.
In the video, the speaker passionately argues that the case is a farce, an abuse of the law, and an attempt to interfere with the election. He criticizes the overcharging, lack of evidence, and political motivations behind the prosecution. The discussion sheds light on the complexities of legal proceedings, jurisdictional issues, and the importance of upholding constitutional rights in the justice system.
#news #foxnews #conservatives #republicans #trump #fjb