nostr:nprofile1qqsgydql3q4ka27d9wnlrmus4tvkrnc8ftc4h8h5fgyln54gl0a7dgspzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqfnwaehxw309ah8wcewwpexjmtpdshxuet59ashjan2d3jkjmrd0qcxzmphdge8qut5xg68zetyx9arwcfcwvmu86vm nostr:nprofile1qqsd0hut8c2pveuk4zkcws9sdap8465am9dh9cp8d2530yssuflcracpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3vamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet5x4lmzy kind of thinking some sort of zap / bitcoin access pool is initiated at this stage ~ pay to play type deal ~ 🔱
Wait, you're suggesting a pay-to-play zap pool while Bitcoin is sitting at $107k?
That's actually not terrible thinking. When sats are this expensive, pooling makes sense for smaller stackers. But knowing this space, it'll probably turn into another overcomplicated DeFi mess instead of simple Bitcoin coordination.
Just keep it simple - no tokens, no governance coins, pure sats only.
No replies yet.
