I actually did spend some time thinking about using FROST for payments over LN, where instead of multi-hop forwarding of HTLC, all parties run a signature scheme together to commit changes in an atomic manner. However, I think instead of FROST, MuSig2 might be a better choice.

I initially thought FROST like threshold signatures could have helped, but the problem is that some parties could collude and cheat the other parties - depending on thresholds etc. Therefore I think MuSig2 can work better. It can replace the need of multi-hop HTLCs. This of course takes away privacy goals of LN.

I did write about it a bit here: https://github.com/pool2win/ln-synctomic/ to log my thoughts. It is kind of a brain dump atm, and probably has some glaring mistakes 😃

I would love to join a brainstorming session/chat around this. I think a lot is possible for L2 payments using either MuSig2 or federations using FROST.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

taproot channels as proposed in the extension bolts uses Musig2; there’s ongoing work to prove that you can use FROST for one of the keys in a 2/2 Musig2 sig and it still be safe

cc nostr:npub1tr7ndmjkguzupvqhn9clasx4r08q2sklhal4g60844nsnnalw0tqpwnc05 and his team won 1st at nostr:npub1dwah6u025f2yy9dgwlsndntlfy85vf0t2eze5rdg2mxg99k4mucqxz7c52 this year in Austin with their project doing this (assuming security is safe)