Yeah 90% of everyone forgot that the 1mb limit was temporary & that the internet would get better Lmfao.
But no one cares and thinks we need more broken code to fix what wasn’t broken.
Yeah 90% of everyone forgot that the 1mb limit was temporary & that the internet would get better Lmfao.
But no one cares and thinks we need more broken code to fix what wasn’t broken.
Is it really so simple ?
Yes
Who stands to gain the most my keeping the block size smaller, keeping the transaction fees higher?
Who stands to gain the most from complex transactions to open ln channels?
Who stands to gain the most from merged mining & sidechains?
What is their argument for keeping Block size smaller? Ive never understood this.
So people in poorer countries could run full nodes easier.
All three questions have the same answer.
Miners.
Which miners the ones who can’t afford to run at a loss.
Which miners are they?
The corporate company miners.
Why does this scare people?
Of course not. There are always tradeoffs. Small blocks = more blocks = more participation = greater decentralization. Larger blocks may also slow down settlement as generally smaller blocks means more frequent blocks.
This makes sense. There is a trade off. It’s not so simple.
You think that’s how things work?
I was more just trying to understand his point of view.