Because the reaction ("like") isn't just for you (the note author). The reaction is also for the creator, to be able to go back and see the things they've liked in the past. The reactions may also be aggregated to provide signal to other observers.

Currently, "+" and "๐Ÿค™" are far and away the most popular reactions, but they're not the only ones. Here are some others that my node has seen in the last couple of days (with counts, to show relative frequency):

["+",259104]

["๐Ÿค™",141352]

["โš ๏ธ",1720]

["๐Ÿ˜†",911]

["๐Ÿ––",504]

["โค๏ธ",433]

["๐Ÿ˜",401]

["๐Ÿ”ฅ",324]

["๐Ÿ”",248]

["๐Ÿ’ฎ",196]

["๐Ÿ˜ญ",180]

["๐Ÿค”",125]

["๐Ÿ’ฅ",117]

["๐Ÿฅ‚",109]

["โšก๏ธ",105]

["๐Ÿคฃ",104]

["๐Ÿ˜ฉ",96]

["๐Ÿ‘ฝ",72]

["๐Ÿพ",70]

["๐Ÿ˜ฎ",69]

["๐Ÿง",68]

["๐Ÿฎ",58]

["๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป",54]

["๐Ÿ˜ƒ",52]

["๐Ÿ‘‘",51]

["๐Ÿฆด",48]

["๐Ÿ‘€",48]

["๐Ÿ˜„",45]

["๐Ÿ˜‚",43]

["๐Ÿ’ฏ",37]

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Very good approach! I like the way you look at it.

The likes are for oneself too, of course! I feel that we have taken a wrong step, there is nothing wrong with that, but our responsibility (in my opinion) is to make self-criticism and evaluate if this change makes sense or not.

My point is the following, have we had the opportunity to give this opinion before? Maybe yes, but I updated yesterday in a routine way and all of a sudden I saw something very disruptive.

Was this discussed somewhere before? I donโ€™t know ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ