Replying to Avatar joiestylotus

There was no taste.

I think the decorative plate NOT meant to be used as a serving plate was from early 1990s. Not that old!

Frankly, I’m very surprised toxic art pigments were allowed to be used on decorative plates that could easily be mistaken for a regular plate only like 30 years ago. If it were from 1800s, I could see since people weren’t aware of dangerous elements like that.

There was nothing to distinguish the decorative plate from a regular serving plate.

Apparently, it didn’t occur to the CEO of the plate manufacturing company that it would be DANGEROUS to use toxic art pigments!

It seems like it would be common sense to *NOT* use toxic art pigments in a product for consumers, you know?

Obviously, it would never fly now cuz FTC oversees safety regulations for things like that.

I’m keeping an eye on my body and will DEFINITELY be fking suing if I was poisoned!
Avatar
hp 1y ago

it must be a decorative plate only for show. Does CEO ever enter any shop-floor to even check? NO!

if any such toxins body has it’s way of removing it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
joiestylotus 1y ago

No, the body does NOT auto remove it! I’m pretty certain it accumulates in the body and lotta exposure to it will definitely physically affect body!

Avatar
hp 1y ago

that would be if you’re regularly consuming also depends on what kind of toxic substance it had. but yes be careful & stay safe