Huge suppprter of covenants. I generally support any well engineered covenant proposal. CTV is the best one in this regard. I will not support a uasf client it if it is rushed and seems likely to create a chain fork. I can't say if I will support this client without a detailed timeline. This is a decision every node runner will need to make. You can't make good decisions w/o good information.

UASF is a massive footgun. It can be used well in order to move majority opinion forward. It can also be used to create a contentious fork and cost all bitcoiners a great deal of time, money, and opportunity cost. Let's never do the latter.

Yes, this is good.