I have a visceral and emotional attraction to P2P. Yet I want to selectively reveal myself to others and the world and protect myself from bad actors.

I do not want to choose between inviting (pseudo/an)onymous peers to connect directly to hardware in my own home and limiting their ability to communicate with me or access my content.

I do not want to expose my home network to the potential security vulnerabilities of running various community driven P2P software.

I do not want to commit the time and head space required to manage these services and my local internet cannot cannot meet the bandwidth and reliability expected in today's world.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I work on nostr because it has a beautiful trade-off balance. It avoids many of the challenges of P2P whilst maintaining decentralisation and censorship resistance.

These thoughts have stemmed from a conversation nostr:npub1896p07z8xngpct5ma00mdrad4gqfnwfwdqcl706wrm25ajynahhs27x5ge and I have been having.

I can't help but be drawn to P2P as a purer embodiment of the organic, bottom up way in which infectious things spread.

My logical brain jumps in and suggests the relay model is better.

I suppose relays are an evolution of the idea of seed nodes in P2P systems like torrents. nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 do you have any thoughts about a comparison between seed nodes and relays? Did the concept of seed nodes play heavily in your thinking when design the relay model?

I'm taking another look at the P2P github alternative radicle.xyz now that the first v1 release candidate is out. They put it quite well:

nostr:note1uvjvy0fs4rpfnk240p3vjkppsp0sqv6t3gsrkzntkn40wg4x59tqe6cxjw

relays are much more mature, as for example, there is a market place of paid relays.

No, only the concept of trackers.

https://fiatjaf.com/nostr.html :

" The problem with SSB (Secure Scuttlebutt)

It doesn’t have many problems. I think it’s great. In fact, I was going to use it as a basis for this, but "