Nostr Web Client

You are right about that. Most of us want to run core just because it is what we knew first and was the most robust.

Core is like the hot girl that knows that you will never leave so she taunts you to leave by saying “we don’t only want you to run core. We want there to be other immplementations.” “You have a vote in what happens, but it won’t change anything.”

When I heard that…. I was gone.

So sometimes we must prove a point.

To be fair I was running both core and knots until they decided that they didn’t care if we switched. Then it was go time.

Vortex | CTV | LNHANCE 6mo ago

I mean I guess go for it if you think running an inferior implementation of something is going to make any material change.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

kc 6mo ago

What makes knots inferior and what makes Core superior? I am up for change if it makes sense.

The change that I currently want to make is on my own node. That is all. I don’t care what makes it to the blockchain. I am the first line of defense.

Plus I believe that when people realize that they have spent sats on sending pictures that can’t be “reused” they will stop it. Sats are not infinite like the governments money printer.

I guarantee they will wish they hadn’t traded sats for fiat. Unless they sold the jpgs for more fiat than it costs on fees, then bought more sats. That would be a good strategy.