The gaping mouth isn't about what works, was my point. It worked ONCE and the algorithm supplies the mouth gaping as the main discoverability factor, regardless of contrary efficacy data. The "logic" is mouth gaping worked so, anything that isn't mouth gaping WON'T work. Supress non mouth gape content.

I don't agree with that logic, I am just pointing out the AI recursion problem.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

you can already see it happening with AI models becoming full of data from AI models, it's like repeatedly encoding an image with jpeg, decode to pixels, reencode to jpeg, until the image is all full of artifacts

it's the trajectory of idiocracy, feeding back data through an endless cycle of retards until it's a cargo cult

DATA}the new oil, lol

and here we are in the richest vein on the internet

A hole in the ARM where the $ goes