The unfossilized and unrotted dino flesh that's been found is another hint
I like imagining that we've got the skeletons wrong and they were actually dragons.
the dinosaur extinction story is starting to get less and less likely to be correct
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2024/dec/massive-asteroid-impacts-did-not-change-earths-climate-long-term
sooner or later they are going to have to revise the story and acknowledge that megafauna existed merely a bit over 12000 years ago and then it was flooded because of a sudden massive rotation caused by a pole shift
Discussion
i'm not surprised that entire fleshy things were found in a state similar to a bog mummy that are allegedly part of a cluster of "fossils"
i mean, the whole fossil thing, my god... you know about how they claimed that oil was a fossil fuel right?
actual coal can contain fossils too but coal can literally form out of plant material that got squashed in a low oxygen environment, literally that's how most fuel was made in much of the british isles,it's called "peat" and it's basically partially carbonised... the water has basically come out of the material slowly with the absence of oxygen there is no decay just dehydration
they literally just lied about it because some coal has fossils in it, and it's carbon, so, all carbon is fossils, and then the entire science of paleontology and geology were distorted by the marketing campaign to maintain this lie
even then it was obviously wrong, but the momentum of all that outrageous wealth of the carbon barons who had declared that the supply was scarce so they had to slow down discovery and they encompassed the industry with all their agents and bought it out or blackmailed or assassinated or just straight up robbed them, with the tool of lobbying and legislation and copyright and patent
the government then limits how much exploration can be done, raises the price high enough that the supply is forced to be below demand and they get a monopoly premium
this racket has been going on for about 150 years, it's disgusting... and now they are even trying to say, this last 50 years, that carbon burning will cause disaster when in fact it's actually led to a very substantial increase in greening and crop yields, more than anything else
carbon is the money of life, and the more there is dug out of the soil the better, it lets us create buffers, it is the best store of energy, i mean, it's disgusting what they have got away with for so long and how they achieve it and then what they use that wealth to do, the hundreds of millions of murders that have taken place defending that monopoly...
Yeah. I suspect, but can't prove, that academia was encouraged to back up the fossil fuel narrative by the same people who coalesced into the Fabian society and started the London school of economics and got all the central banks going and encouraged eugenics in socialist regimes. Its a grand conspiracy theory... that is so well supported by evidence that the only reason left to disbelieve is the incredible scope of it.
But... Thank God for hydrocarbons. If not for their useful combustion products, the deserts would be much bigger and we might be seeing reglaciation now. And the fiat retards think growing glaciers is a good thing, lol.