nostr:npub18znyslzd7qy03saq0u667nr2hltxja5dkhka02qczlykmp8dx7qs2j7c68 Guilty as charged but, with no real access to the study I am very, very sceptical. On Y axis they use oz-EQ which likely means something else than real consumption (eq as in equivalent but equivalent what?). "Measured" curve has bizzare and impossible 40% of population not eating beef at all, nonsense... Hence, just some manipulative study akin to 97% scientists agree (when in reality by the real numbers in that paper it was just 30% "agreeing")