Is Absurdism compatible with objectivism? I certainly see absurdism as fitting more with Aristotle and existentialism than with Plato and the abstract forms, but can it be blended with objectivism? The idea that the universe of the cat is different to the universe of people is very post modern, but Camus also says that “The absurd is lucid reason noting its limits.” This seems to adhere with objectivist commitment to reason. What do you think Nostriches?
Discussion
Camus is also quoted as saying "The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion”.
Remember the wise words of Carl Brutananadilewski: 
Yes rebellion against the absurd is a key component of absurdist theory, but rebellion is against the lack of purpose and meaning not against physics or science. Why should my rebellion conflict with objectivism?
I dun have to. Again there is quite the freedom in saying "Fuck it, none of this matters!" and still seeking one's own happiness and rational self interest.
Ayn Rand says “Reason is man’s only means of grasping reality and of acquiring knowledge” but Camus advocates for “facts the heart can feel” how would you reconcile these views in order to blend Absurdism and Objectivism?