Nostr Web Client

YOU SHOULD ACTUALLY TEST WHIRLPOOL BECAUSE YOU FUNDAMENTALLY DO NOT UNDERSTAND HOW IT WORKS.

UTXOS IN THE SAME TXO ARE FORCED INTO DIFFERENT ROUNDS.

MEANWHILE YOU ARE ADVOCATING FOR A COORDINATOR THAT ACTIVELY COOPERATES WITH SURVEILLANCE FIRMS AND A PROTOCOL THAT GRINDS UTXOS INTO DUST.

Kruw 2y ago

A Sybil attacker is not limited to using a single client, they can tx0 with multiple clients in order to participate in the same round. YOU APPARENTLY DO NOT FUNDAMENTALLY UNDERSTAND HOW IT WORKS SINCE YOU THOUGHT FLOODING PAYS LESS IN COORDINATOR FEES COMPARED TO CONSOLIDATING.

I've never "advocated for a coordinator", I'm pointing out technical flaws that waste block space and harm privacy and create unbalanced incentives that subsidize Sybil attacks and all you do is VIRTUE SIGNAL TO DEFLECT FROM REAL ARGUMENTS. If you really gave a shit about "censorship", you would just check the "run coordinator" box on your BTCPay Server coinjoin plugin. Do you have the balls?

Let's talk about dust grinding! Whirlpool is paying 369 sats in fees to create a non private output for 305 sats??? https://mempool.space/address/bc1qp25y8kfywz88myuh7ed3dmx3vv2z2dwuxhjnlv

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

ODELL 2y ago

> A Sybil attacker is not limited to using a single client, they can tx0 with multiple clients in order to participate in the same round.

YES, AND THEY WOULD PAY MORE IN FEES THAN AN HONEST PARTICIPANT. THAT IS THE POINT.

Kruw 2y ago

NO, THEY WOULD PAY LESS IN FEES, AS I CALCULATED ABOVE:

nostr:nevent1qqsxy0jpyte535k6x734v33d87ksdafst27qc9ta2aqnpzew6kn43pgppamhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5pzqzuaulz7stfxc2zkjzsne5tyzjd95rhrzvdejyhpczand3ntgudtqvzqqqqqqyq40ye3

THIS FLOODING DISCOUNT FOR SYBIL ATTACKERS DOESN'T EVEN STOP AT 10 UTXOS, IT GOES TO 70 UTXOS IN THE 1M-50M SAT POOLS!