Nostr Web Client

are you drunk?

that isn't what we are talking about.

YOU'RE saying because there's a possible *active attack* on a monero user that could be executed by a sophisticated adversary that could result in them linking two subaddresses together (OMG),

users should always send from a new wallet by default.

(which is bullshit)

and as if most LN users transactions aren't trivially linked together by their custodian or the one or two LSPs they have a channel with...

now you want to talk about knowing where the money goes?

well ok I guess

but you haven't said anything about your first FUD yet.

Super Testnet 2w ago 💬 1

> which is bullshit

If "create an entirely new wallet for every tx" is bad advice then maybe submit a PR to withdraw that advice from the monero project's website

> most LN users transactions [are] trivially linked together by their custodian or the one or two LSPs they have a channel with

I acknowledge that most LN users are not using it in a privacy preserving way. Do you acknowledge that most monero users aren't?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Hanshan 2w ago

understandably you want to change the subject and make broad generalizations.

right here we're talking about transaction linkability.

YOU brought it up.

linking transactions sent to different subaddresses, as YOU described and claimed it means you have burn every wallet with each tx,

requires a sophisticated active attack on a specific monero user.

the same sort of transaction linking is TRIVIAL in a passive way in the vast majority of LN usage

so yes

I absolutely dispute that monero tx linkability sucks as bad as LN

so now you want to talk about something else?