What's the case against using something like this as a nostr login address for normies?

(instead of using the "@" from NIP-05)

In the context of:

note1qapjezf9sk6ytj8vftd3e6n2n9szzjx282urhav7nd4xmslyzd4s3uln6v

#nostrdesign #onboarding

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

usernameⓝdomain.com

Introducing a new concept when everyone is already familiar with the current one.

login?

that's not how this thing works. you don't need to log in. you just sign events and publish them.

Although technically true I'm not going to change every "Log In" button with "Choose the npub you want to publish events for and pick a way to sign events with the according nsec" 😜

you aren't going to have users pick anything because that's handled by the detached signer, eg alby.

Too complex to type, unfortunately

🤷🏻‍♂️

Jurásico problems

Uhu, I guess that 's the trade off indeed:

This and the new concept introduction

VS

What!? It's not an email address/hashtag?