Downloading an app gets you:
* 0% of the way to verifying what every circuit in your phone does
* 0% of the way to verifying what every circuit in every satellite does
* 0% of the way to verifying what every circuit in every lab does
But the marketing implies the provided privacy percentage is:
100%
Got it. Nirvana fallacy much.
Nope
Lying to users isn't a good solution to user security. I'm not shooting down a good idea by saying that, I'm just correct.
And it's perfectly possible to address user security in better ways than lying. For example, we already discussed the possibility of making a similar app without lying about it.
Or is the definition Google just showed me not what you meant? I'm not familiar with this
You're getting hung up on marketing slogans that would be violated if the OS spied on the user which it might well be doing but you shit on this project for not acknowledging it might be doing this? Come on, get real.
No u, unironically
I'm not lying, how am I the one that's supposed to "get real?"
Are you stupid?
Modern cryptography makes is possible to send data from A to B through insecure channels. You don't have to trust the middelman. What does the circuit in a satellite can do to change that?
I'm not stupid, your question is
You don't know if there are satellites capable of identifying every image your GPU displays, based on signal it emits
You don't even know if the phone transmits images itself
