Peer review could potentially be useful, if it was not controlled. I would love to see a nostr based platform for submitting scientific studies and white papers. Anyone could 'peer review' these studies to point out where they are not sound and expose funding.

Would need work and could be abused, just a quick thought. Maybe people with verified qualifications would have more 'weight' to their reviews. 🤔

As it is now, peer review is a poor stand in for reproducing the results of a study or experiment. How many studies are not reviewed because they do not involve carbon or cow farts as a cause for climate change?