Not sure what you want to know about hashrate.

Doggie coin is more censorship resistant for poor people as long as the community stays committed to keeping transaction fees low. It will also become more censorship resistant for rich people if enough of them agree on it, the same way they make Bitcoin more censorship resistant for themselves by agreeing on it. Either way, the censorship resistance is pretty weak as long as the richest people are still the dollar printing people. If the dollar printing people aren't really sticking with this censorship resistance thing, then we're fundamentally relying on getting people to switch from soft money to hard money so the dollar printing people wouldn't be in control anymore, and we're fundamentally relying on the world war 3 economy to help us try to show people the importance of hard money. In that case, it probably doesn't matter if we have any of this at all, gold and silver would work fine.

Self custody isn't real, but which coin has the advantage would depend which of these 2 factors is bigger -

* Doggie coin: financial institutions are less likely to handle doggie coin for customers

* Bitcoin: manufacturers are less likely to make doggie-only hardware wallets than Bitcoin-only hardware wallets

I guess doggie coin probably must have a higher percentage of people avoiding IOU-style holding, but a lower percentage of people using hardware wallets.

Then there's also measuring by percentage of coins instead of percentage of people. That gets too complicated for me to speculate on, and meanwhile the reported statistics probably get more detailed and accurate in that perspective.

I'm out of my depth for the rest. I hate the dogecoin community and whatever a thinkboi piece is 🤳

The #1 reason to stack doggie coins is so Elon Musk can't have them