> Maybe it won’t go through but you can’t prevent someone from trying.

If my lightning address endpoint has “blocked pubkeys” in the data, why would I show a button that would be guaranteed to fail ?

> you’re trying to control what people do

No I’m giving individuals the power to control the types of interactions they have on the network. I am not forcing this on anyone. I actually have no problem enabling the like button for people who dont have OnlyZaps on for OnlyZaps profiles, I am just really trying to understand why people care about sending zaps to people who will never get it and why they feel this strongly about it. For me I just see it as a ux flaw.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I thought this was more of a protocol discussion than a just a damus UX discussion… 😅

I personally wouldn’t want other peoples profiles to show a zap button if they wouldn’t/couldn’t receive it…

Liking seems maybe a little different because even if the person posting doesn’t want to see the likes, I can see how other may still want to like a post and posts that gets lots of likes is a way for people to find good content. So while the person posting would never see it, it could still be really useful for others.