Agree. We'll have to revisit that debate eventually, unless somebody much smarter than me comes up with a more clever and elegant solution to the problem. Arbitrary block size, big or small, has problems one way or another. Dynamic block size, with certain constraints, might be a solution.

I still think L2s are the way though. The more we grow lightning and add channels the better probably.

All I know for certain is custodial solutions are not the way.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ironically dynamic block sizes come to bcash next year.

It's working ok on Monero so far. I'd still prefer to see viable L2 solutions I think and leave the base layer alone.