Scientific progress is a kind of a mirage. Populations change and the so does the data. Evidenced based medicine is just like every scientific enterprise—linear, and progressive only within a given paradigm. New paradigms are more the result of new thinking, than accumulated data from the old paradigm. Check out “the structure of scientific revolutions” by Thomas Kuhn.
Discussion
Other than in my case, where science has been redacted for some idea of ethical medicine overruling scientific knowledge, I'm too analytical to believe anything other than those vaccines save lives and that's science. It's basically immoral from a societal perspective and selfish to not get them. You do you, but that doesn't make you right. I prefer moral decisions, it makes life and society better.
“Immoral from a societal perspective” seems like a Utilitarianism (greatest good for greatest number”. This may appeal to your analytical mindset, but I think it is a brutal totalitarian philosophy that can justify anything in the name of the societal perspective.
And “you do you…I prefer moral” is obnoxious and smug.
You may find yourself in a very small society with this approach.
I'm dying, it makes life simple.