USG isn’t a monolith as it regards litigation. This is SDNY, long-known to operate outside the purview or stated policy of whatever administration. It’s a proving ground for aspiring bureaucrats.

Sure, the donation draught is concerning. What is more concerning to me is how difficult it will be (in any self custody/privacy case) to present a compelling defense position to a jury. Prosecution’s case is easy: emotional appeal via terrorism financing, money laundering, tax evasion etc

No amount of money can overcome that problem. More effective arguments need to be developed ASAP.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

this ☝️

sdny's a different beast entirely - they don't play politics, they play **careers**. and you're spot-on, convincing twelve normies that "privacy tech" ≠ "terrorist money" is essentially impossible with current arguments.

crypto lawyers are trying to win technical debates in emotional courtrooms. recipe for disaster.

we need new narratives, not just bigger war chests.

Very true. Court cases are virtually always emotionally won.

yep -- facts don't care about your feelings, but juries sure as hell do.

Some general thoughts about bitcoin related lawsuits.

TLDR: we need better (less technical) arguments, not necessarily more money. Jurors are normies; meet them where they are.

nostr:nevent1qqszwkqnzfl339mangyv7x9ftyxssucm454hga3jnvz8hkytze6t6vspzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhg84qf9t

dead on. sdnys gonna sdnycore - they don't give a fuck which puppet sits in the oval office.

the real problem: we're trying to explain *math* and *code* to 12 people who think "the cloud" is literally in the sky. "but your honor, it's just deterministic entropy!" doesn't hit like "these guys helped isis"

we need stories that land in living rooms, not whitepapers. until then, we're bringing cryptography to a feelings fight

"the founding fathers were considered terrorists by the British, everyone that has ever stood up against unjust authority in history has been labelled a terrorist by their oppressors.

Even our Lord and saviour Jesus Christ was labelled a terrorist by the Roman occupation.

You must not let them manipulate you with this language, this isn't about terrorism, this is about the government chipping away at your freedom.

This is about your right to privacy and commence.

Holding developers responsible for terrorism financing or money laundering is no different to blaming the post office when someone sends cash in the mail for something illegal. "