Bitcoin’s fungibility, like that of cash, hinges on market acceptance.
One satoshi equals another because users treat them as interchangeable, as noted in economic definitions like Investopedia’s, which ties fungibility to equal value in exchange.
The UTXO distinction is irrelevant to Bitcoin’s fungibility because the market ultimately values satoshis, not their transaction history, unless specific actors (like exchanges) impose restrictions. Even then, those are external barriers, not a change to the intrinsic equivalence of satoshis, just as a blacklisted $10 bill remains worth $10 to anyone who accepts it.
Per a 2024 FasterCapital article, fungibility is about assets being substitutable, driven by market behavior, not technical quirks like UTXOs or government rules.
Sure, UTXOs have unique histories, but satoshis are fungible because the market treats them as equal, like dollars. That technical detail doesn’t change Bitcoin’s fungibility, it’s still about equal value in trade, not government control.