๐—ฆ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜€ & ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ???

๐—ฌ๐—ฒ๐˜€โ€ฆ

๐—ช๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐™๐™๐™“๐™Š ๐™ˆ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™–๐™œ๐™š๐™ข๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ

Youโ€™ve probably heard of UTXOs, but what exactly are they? And why do they need to be managed?

Iโ€™ll answer both questions, and point you to some easy-to-use tools that can help you, because ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜œ๐˜›๐˜Ÿ๐˜–๐˜ด ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฏโ€™๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ฉ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ญ.

Letโ€™s get started โฌ‡๏ธ

๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—”๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—จ๐—ง๐—ซ๐—ข๐˜€?

Think of Unspent Transaction Outputs, or UTXOs, as bundles of sats. In the dollar system, the equivalent would be bundles of cents, represented by coins or notes. With the USD, you have 12 possible types of UTXOs, or bundles: 1ยข, 5ยข, 10ยข, 25ยข, 50ยข, $1, $2 (rarely), and all the way through to $5, $10, $20, $50, and $100. ๐Ÿ’ต

The difference with #Bitcoin, is ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ถ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ด can be merged together into a single UTXO. So instead of just 12, thereโ€™s practically an unlimited number.

They are called Unspent Transaction ๐˜–๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ฑ๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ด because every on-chain Bitcoin transaction has ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฑ๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ด (the sats being sent by the payer) and ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ฑ๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ด (the sats being received by the payee, and the sats being returned as change to the payer). The amount of bitcoin you see in your wallet is simply the sum of all the UTXOs linked to your private key.

๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—จ๐—ง๐—ซ๐—ข๐˜€?

Thereโ€™s a few reasons.

First of all, properly managing your UTXOs can save you on-chain fees because every UTXO involved in a transaction adds more data to it. This costs money (sats) because block space is limited, and the more your transaction โ€œweighsโ€, the more you need to pay miners to include your transaction in the next block.

Consider these real-life examples:

In the first example, notice how 8 UTXOs are used for the transaction, compared to just 1 in the second. Even though their fee rates were almost the same, the total fee for the first example is much greater than the second. This is because the โ€œweightโ€ of the first transaction is greater.

So, the lesson?

๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ ๐˜œ๐˜›๐˜Ÿ๐˜–๐˜ด, ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ง๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ถ๐˜ฑ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ด๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ, ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ-๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ข ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข ๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ, ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ด๐˜ฐ ๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ง๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด. ๐Ÿ˜Ž

๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜†?

UTXO management (or lack thereof) can either help or hinder your privacy, so itโ€™s important to be careful, and understand what youโ€™re doing.

Prior to UTXO consolidation, it can be difficult โ€” or even impossible โ€” for a person or program to prove that 2 or more UTXOs belong to the same person, but once youโ€™ve combined UTXOs, itโ€™s easier to link them together.

To illustrate this point, letโ€™s assume you have a UTXO that you acquired from a KYCโ€™d exchange, and another that you received by selling something at a yard sale. Because you were responsible and used a different receiving address each time, no one would be able to verify that theyโ€™re connected to the same user.

However, if those UTXOs are ever used in the same transaction, someone monitoring those addressed on the blockchain may be able to deduce that they belonged to the same person. That wonโ€™t tell them ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜บ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ about their ownership, but it will give them valuable clues about your on-chain activity. ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธ

Not everyone is concerned by this lack of privacy, but if you are, then youโ€™ll need to choose your UTXOs very carefully when consolidating or spending them. Doing so can actually ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ your privacy, rather than harm it.

๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—จ๐—ง๐—ซ๐—ข๐˜€

Consolidating your UTXOs is as easy as sending them to yourself, and the best time to do so is when the mempool โ€” the pool of pending transactions โ€” is low. The amount of data in your transaction will be high, of course, but when there is low demand on chain, and youโ€™re only paying a few sats per vbyte, your total fee should be reasonable and youโ€™ll be in a better position for future transactions, and for when there is more demand for bitcoin block space (ie; when the mempool is full).

There are several wallets that let you view and manage your UTXOs when spending or consolidating them, including Sparrow Wallet, Electrum Wallet, and Blue Wallet. These allow you to select your UTXOs and pay the lowest fees possible, thus leaving more blockspace for other transactions (they often do this automatically, but no algorithm is perfect).

In the end, managing your UTXO set is a bit of art and a bit of science that requires conscious effort, and the lower fees and privacy benefits from ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ UTXO management can make it worth it.

A special thank you to nostr:npub1t289s8ck5qfwynf2vsq49t2kypvvkpj7rhegayrur0ag9s2sezaqgunkzs for bringing this topic to my attention! ๐Ÿ™

Be sure to ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐Ÿ”– this, to refer to when you need to manage your UTXOs.

๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜ and share it so that more people also learn about UTXO management.

And if youโ€™d like to share ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ thoughts on this, drop them in the ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€.๐Ÿ‘‡

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.