It's unlikely for someone getting some free bitcoin from faucets to be still holding them today, just like the lucky fucker that finds a Van Gogh in the basement is going to immediately selling it. I think that most people now talking, using, whinging about bitcoin are relatively new to the matter. I'm not criticizing, I'm just saying that sometimes there's not even past financial returns in who's holding bitcoin, there's only hope for some future ones because of some extrapolations from the past gains.

I'm no exception to that in a sense, I think it's an interesting tool, probably very impactful from the political and social pov, if people will get it.

Other than that, it's pretty obvious that the overwhelming majority of wealthy people didn't get wealthy by hodling one specific asset, because from a statistical pov it's not a strategy that lower the variance of returns of you invested capital.

Again, not critizing bitcoin holders here, just stating facts

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Wealthy people usually own income-generating assets like small businesses, valuable patents, or shares.

The "spend €50 on crypto and end up a gazillionaire" thing only worked because it was a tiny, rapidly-growing market. Now that there are hundreds of millions of us stacking, there's no real asynchronisity of knowledge to leverage and it's become a relatively-reliable savings vehicle, with unusually high returns.

Best deal around, but probably won't make you very rich unless you already are and can therefore buy loads of it.