In other words you havent made sure all Bitcoin transactions work out and that it's supply is sound
An advantage you don't take advantage of is hardly an advantage
In other words you havent made sure all Bitcoin transactions work out and that it's supply is sound
An advantage you don't take advantage of is hardly an advantage
Do you have evidence that the Bitcoin supply isn’t 21 million?
The onus is on you to prove it does because you are claiming it does (you want us to prove a negative)
This is logic 101
No actually the onus is on them to prove that their zero proof shit actually guarantees supply soundness. Since they’re proposing that Bitcoin should change the base layer.