l also like the examples of forums/message boards in the post. I was wondering if the problem and why it hasn't been done properly is that it is assumed a discord -like is needed. Which would cost a squillion quid to make and 4 years to develop. When really phpBB/ Craigslist forums could be emulated ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

nostr:nevent1qqsyruzzgfpkrl8980vu5kjea0zqnu4wk3ka8yljc5ctwh4q7l2996cpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43z7q3qnjst6azswskk5gp3ns8r6nr8nj0qg65acu8gaa2u9yz7yszjxs9sxpqqqqqqzkjn04l

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

devSlop . I keep thinking some sort of discussion graph would be cool UX; like a "view map" in the old rpg games, so you could lurk in related branched off discussions

Maybe that humble.horse thing is working on something similar? Not sure.

Will have a look

Forums/message boards inherently assume some degree of centralization which is antithetical to Nostr design.

The decentralized approach is just freeform search over all messages and then conversations linked to the ones you liked.

Surely there are workarounds?

Or are you saying Nostr social is doomed to just microblogging? 🤔

I don't see this as a flaw? In fact having a centralized architecture is itself always a flaw since it is vulnerable to attack or corruption at that central point.

could make sense this is microblogging macro made?

That's actually the distributed approach. Decentralized would be something in-between Big Ball of Events and Atomized Events.