This is inane.

It isn't unlimited or ungoverned funding, and it isn't risking destabilizing the network. Rather, it is the lack of open source developer funding is what risks destabilizing the network (lack of eyeballs doing deep code review).

If any of the founders that control premined shitcoins started donating to bitcoin developers, I'd be happy about it. They have no means of changing or destabilizing the network. I choose what software I run and the consensus rules I subscribe to.

Saylor does a masterful job of talking out of both sides of his mouth throughout this interview.

nostr:note1lztgv2g4jesq4kkkadhstzzg7kernrqudw85ca4lpssq5p8wtmzq4y5qag