Yeah - seems weird. Not a lawyer, but the boilerplate seems like it could just as easily say “every side of hard forked assets will always belong to and be accessible by the user”

If we take a hard fork to change the block size for example - your keys will still correctly sign transactions in both chains, and your balance will be the same in both, it’s just that nodes will allow future transactions to Jon blocks of different sizes in the future.. maybe transaction broadcasting could be different?? Doesn’t make any sense. Maybe their lawyers are simply only as informed as that coinbase guy