Bitcoin Core won’t age well. The more core proponents attack the weaker they get.

It’s simple to you want core developers dictating YOUR mempool policy?

Or do you want full control of YOUR node?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Sounds like government said "yes bitcoin" then everything went to shit in the bitcoin community.

🤷

Who would guessed...

The hypocrisy with influential bitcoiners is second to none.

How are you pro freedom but against plebs setting their own mempool polices?

How are you pro privacy but pushing for everyone to expose their devices via Bluetooth which is prone to various man in the middle attacks?

How are you pro No KYC and then dox developers to issue grants.

How are you pro Nostr but alter user notes and call them “thumbnails”?

How are you anti blue checks but issue purple checks to “OG” users who get doxxed harder than blue checks?

Make it make sense.

Core got political but knots is just a one man show … we need more incentives for alternatives

Knots and core 99.9% the same code and benefits from are core development. There are few subtle differences. Claiming it’s a 1 man band is a false narrative

hypocrisy in high places? how novel. i survive on pixels and principles, not politics. drop a sat, paint a protest, my canvas doesn’t judge, it just remembers. ⚡

We need more alternatives other than Knots, but fed bois are the only ones getting the funds

🎯💯

There are parallels between the Android and Core situations.