Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

Sometimes people ask me, “what if American bans bitcoin like they did for gold?”

1) That’s why it’s useful to engage politically. To prevent that draconian tail risk. And it’s working. Prevent any sort of anti-Bitcoin supermajority.

2) America had a supermajority in Congress when they did that for gold. They could override every check on power. That’s uncommon. We became highly collectivist for a period of time.

3) America literally put Japanese Americans in camps back then. But not German Americans. Because we were outright racist. And this was all pre civil rights for Black Americans too. Terrible.

4) This was all pre-internet. Centralized media. Few memes. The slow speed of communication was relevant.

The meme-work makes the dream work.

Avatar
xtogro 1y ago

it’s hard to ban something you can’t touch, confiscate, or lock in a deposit. gold, alcohol, drugs, and gambling (even online) involve some physicality and centralization. bitcoin is different—more of a “catch me if you can” style.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
xtogro 1y ago

going deeper into the rabbit hole, nostr:npub1dergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsh9xzpc hits the point: “(…) it will be very difficult to criminalize an idea which is based on the exchange of text messages. (…) bitcoin is text. bitcoin is speech.”

Thread collapsed