So what's Cathedra's position on this nostr:npub1guh5grefa7vkay4ps6udxg8lrqxg2kgr3qh9n4gduxut64nfxq0q9y6hjy?
No question that the big 4 pools are WAY too large, and as nostr:npub1m0n0nautpnk0jntmg89kgjucfwygrsppcpf963um5eqkjehqwess7rd0un and @0x10c identified, there's even further centralisation behind them
It's a simple "problem" to resolve: miners point their hashrate elsewhere .. basically anywhere EXCEPT Foundry, Antpool, ViaBTC and F2Pool - all of them too large and all in jurisdictions clearly hostile to Bitcoin
What is Cathedra going to do?
nostr:note18f6s5z2qyvvt9wvd669aaue8xg4da8n688nrttjv46uat7mx835sak4ms8
It's not just these four pools. Many more use the same (Antpool's) block template
Please Login to reply.
Yep .. and the big 4 are the worst of it
