Is Michael Malice a Bitcoiner? If he isn’t, why not? Seems like he has nearly all the requisite pieces. Could say the same for JBP. Tough watching their conversation with no mention of Bitcoin.
Discussion
He’s not a Bitcoiner but he does hodl some. The why I think is because he’s more interested in the philosophy of anarchism than the ideas of Austrian economics so he’s never dived deep enough to understand the problems and how Bitcoin fixes them
That sounds correct. In his talk with JBP, he brings up time preference and how he often confuses high and low, which seems to indicate he only has a cursory understating of Austrian economics. It’s amazing how many disciplines it takes to grok Bitcoin! 
Malice is an interesting one for me.
I was initially all over his stuff, bought his book. Loved the quotes and sound bytes.
I got burned out though.
Maybe if he studied, and understood Bitcoin I'd have renewed interest in his brand.
Some people like complaining but have an aversion to solutions as that requires work, not sure if that applies to the above guys though.
A great point! It’s one that I frequently use as a critique of the heterodox, IDW types who have a gaping, Bitcoin sized hole at the center of all their models, especially JBP. Subconsciously, I think they know that Bitcoin disintermediates many of their grievances and dilemmas. They avoid embracing that process out of the fear of losing their identity that is built around a personalized collection of, what Orwell called, “petty specific grievances.” 
You mean the guy who has laser eyes in his Instagram profile?