WabiSabi doesn't have a peeling model. Traceable change is eliminated unless your input is larger than all other inputs combined.
Whirlpool is worse since peels the change in tx0 and leaves it there, unable to be spent.
Strictly speaking Wasabi is worse because of the peeling model.
"Additionally Wasabi outputs are in the order in which they are registered". Has this been fixed?
https://twitter.com/ODELL/status/1151882688053334016
Maybe #[9] wants to chime in.
WabiSabi doesn't have a peeling model. Traceable change is eliminated unless your input is larger than all other inputs combined.
Whirlpool is worse since peels the change in tx0 and leaves it there, unable to be spent.
No replies yet.