It's all about "free" speech. Right?!

That's why we #nostr

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ehm. What? πŸ˜… for real?

Convince your followers to switch to #nostr πŸ₯³

Not in his defence on this - but it’s more an attempt to mitigate bots than collect a new revenue stream. Adding a monetary control in the form of an annual $1 subscription will put pressure on the malicious users who use automation to create thousands of fake accounts and spam the network.

Thanks for the note Anna and it's not surprising. Nostr is the way forward not tweeter.

#Halving #BTC πŸš€πŸ”₯πŸš€πŸ”₯πŸš€πŸ”₯ #BTC #Zap⚑#Nostr #FreeJulianAssange

I knew this was coming

Lol so its just going to be influnecers talking to each other, thats going to be fun

T&C’s apply: Free speech is free providing you pay a small fee and only say things that we allow.

He should take a page out of his buddies at open ai and do the iris scan thing.

Feds at the door matching your iris for calling Hillary a lizard. πŸ’€πŸ’€

well, StackerNews is an amazing platform to speak freely but every action you take is chraged. you pay sats to post, to comment, to zap..., and yet is one of the best platforms to share content IMO πŸ€”

Followed🫑

πŸ™ŒπŸ»πŸ§‰πŸ«‚

also there is a case to be made (and I'm not a fan of Musk) but for you to be free of external influence, you need to be self-sustainable. For example, if you rely a LOT on gov. subsidies or selling ads, then those are sort of your bosses

Don't know all the info on this but there was talk that this would possibly be introduced at some point to stop out Bot accounts.

If they are created by AI on mass, it would start to get very expensive to push out post from 100,000 Bot accounts.