The UK is spending £8billion/year on illegals, while in three years they've provided just £7.6 billion on military assistance to Ukraine.
Basically they'd rather waste billions on unproductive and violent non-whites (mostly) then help white people fighting to keep all of Europe safe.
We could compromise and give them all jobs demining Ukraine... It's not very difficult work. Just incredibly man power intensive to do safely, and dangerous if you get complacent.
Talking about melatonin, distracts from real problems like massive ilegal inmigration and makes you look terribly dumb.
I mention it because I know damn well that far left politics likes to hate on Ukraine because they're white. Equally, one reason why they support mass illegal immigration is because the illegals are almost all non-white. There absolutely is a racial component to this.
I went to art school. I got to see this insanity first hand.
The left are anti-Ukrainian because they're pro-Russian. But Russians are as white as Ukrainians so there goes your theory.
Nope. Russians make a big deal out of BRICS, as well as how "diverse" their fighting force is. Lots of far-left people buy that nonsense.
Also, lots of far left people like Russia because they think they'll somehow get a return to communism by supporting Russia. Even in battle Russian forces have often used hammer-and-sickle insignia.
The latter rings much truer than the former.
This is why I Bitcoin I don't want to support either.
Ukraine is just globalist geopolitics the same clowns bringing in the 3rd world
My thoughts exactly. Both are a waste of money. Ukraine was unnecessary and was provoked to boost military spending in the 🇺🇸 while harming Russia. I’m sure a lot of secret billionaires were made from the graft. Nobody cared about the Ukrainian lives lost.
Fix the money, fix the world.
I believe there is a racial component and the elites and commies hate white people but we can be better than them.
Peter, did you read the article? I just did.
It says “migrants”, not “illegals“. The equivalence of “migrants” and “illegals” here is your personal conflation.
The article says that all this puts pressure to crack down on illegal migrants, a subset of migrants, but the article does not say, in any way, what you are ranting about.
Pay attention, and do better.
If you're unemployed it's hard to be legally in the UK as a non-citizen unless you qualify for some sort of refugee status (and thus aren't a migrant).
Anyway, my point is equally valid regardless of the exact legal situation. It's completely insane to spend enormous sums of money on foreigners who are on average, less productive and more violent than the people already in your country.
are you clubbing high skilled immigrant with others and painting with broad brush saying that immigrants are less productive..
Productive foreigners don't get called "migrants" or "illegals"
I've been a productive foreigner most of my adult professional life and I've been a migrant every minute of it.
😂
Hardly anyone uses that term in that sense.
Legal immigration with high standards is fine, at least for the country allowing immigrants in. Arguably it's a bad thing for the world as it tends to lead to brain drains, depriving poorer countries of their talented people.
Obviously letting in millions of poor people with few skills, low intelligence, and violent cultures is a terrible idea.
