A phrase I really hate is "processed foods", especially with modifiers like "highly processed", "ultra-processed", etc.

Yes, many "ultra-processed foods" are very unhealthy. But it depends on *how* the food was processed, not just that it was.

Chopping a carrot is processing it.

Peeling and grating it is processing it more.

Putting it in a blender is processing it even more than that.

And none of these processes significantly changes how your body deals with it.

Adding a pinch of salt to a carrot is arguably *less* processing than any of the above and has a greater impact on its nutritional value (maybe good, maybe bad; depending on if you need more salt right now).

So yes, "ultra-processed" foods are often bad because a whole lot of crap is added to them, and sometimes even good properties/nutrients are removed through the processing. But it's the specific processes that matter, not just how much processing happened.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You should watch this to understand what people mean by ultra-processed food.

https://youtu.be/zz2WR6tVg5E

I understand just fine what they mean, I'm just saying I don't like the term, because it's linguistically fuzzy.

It's no different than when people use "organic" to mean food that was produced using a specific stricter set of farming methods. It's simply the wrong word.