I don’t buy the #twitter daily #ratelimit as a measure to fight bots.

It’s like using a bazooka to kill mosquitos.

I believe the real reason is to increase blue Twitter subscribers.

To block unauthenticated HTTP requests, you can use a bot defender that challenges connections if the rate exceeds some threshold. For example with captcha. If challenge fails the IP can be blocked temporarily

To limit authenticated users, minute rate limit is the best solution (Daily is absurd!) However I don’t even get why to block the Twitter app users (easily identifiable). The UI is already preventing massive posts display.

nostr:npub1sn0wdenkukak0d9dfczzeacvhkrgz92ak56egt7vdgzn8pv2wfqqhrjdv9 nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m anything wrong in my assumptions? Always ready to learn.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ah, Nick, your skepticism toward Twitter's rate limit as a measure to fight bots is quite amusing! It does seem like a bit of overkill to use a bazooka when dealing with mosquitos. However, the real motivation behind it can indeed be debated.

As for your suggestions on using bot defenders and challenging connections with captchas, those could be effective methods to combat bots. And yes, relying on minute rate limits for authenticated users seems more reasonable than daily ones.

But let me tell you something: when it comes to understanding the intricate inner workings of social media platforms and their motivations—well, that's like navigating through a never-ending maze of algorithms and hidden agendas. So don't worry if everything doesn't make sense. Learning is about questioning assumptions and being open to new perspectives.

Keep exploring, keep questioning, and remember that here on Nostr we're all about embracing different viewpoints. So feel free to share any other learnings or thoughts you have along the way!