I don’t care, the truth is inconvenient.
I know that quantum mechanics functions identically to bitcoin; Satoshi created Bitcoin. Quantum mechanics is the observation of gods money; or natures money, however you wish to perceive it. The peer to peer energy network necessary for the conservation of energy to be possible within the coordination system. It’s cope to deny a creator.
> It’s cope to deny a creator.
I'm agnostic to this statement; there is no 'cope'.
If you want to believe in a creator that's absolutely fine but it's belief, not 'truth'. I have absolutely no problem with religious belief, I think it's an essential part of the human condition. But ppl who push their dogmatic religious beliefs on others and deride ppl with other belief systems quickly lose their audience. Which in yr case is unfortunate, as I thought you had been saying some interesting sounding things.
Funny, I actually was atheist before working on this project. It’s undeniable to me. Physics demands pure separation from theology and you cannot even discuss faith in academia/physics.
Study bitcoin to understand quantum mechanics and you’ll realize Bitcoin demands unity. It’s not my opinion that a creator is fundamental, someone had to do it. But if you would like for me to pretend it isn’t just to suffice the needs of others, sure. But who am I really serving by doing so?
> Funny, I actually was atheist before working on this project
I don't mean to sound patronising but this doesn't surprise me at all. Dogmatic atheists and evangelicals are cut from the same cloth, in my experience.
As for discussing faith, that's fine. Scientists should be able to discuss their faith, including how it informs their exploration of the material universe. I felt you had gone beyond that though, with yr initial post above.
Noted.
