Perhaps Jesus was not actually concerned about his followers being so impenetrably thick that they couldnโ€™t tell the difference between a weak human being born to die, and the โ€œimmortal invisible God only wiseโ€โ€ฆ I would suggest that using words like โ€œholy fatherโ€ in analogous senses about two such radically different orders of being is so commonplace as to not require comment or defense, and certainly creates no confusion on the part of anyone older than the age of three.

I get called Jesus and God all the time โ€ฆ by three year olds. Everyone else just chuckles.

I also work regularly with evangelical, Bible-only Christians who want nothing to do with calling me Father. I explain to them that itโ€™s more a reminder to me that I am called to lay down my life, as fathers must, rather than to demand blind obedience from Godโ€™s flock. My parishioners certainly donโ€™t obey me blindly. I invite the Sola Scriptura Christians to use the title, in that sense, as an act of charity. They always decline, so there are a few terms I suggest as alternatives. In the end, if they call me Nick, Iโ€™m not worried about it, but I pray for an increase in brotherly love on the part of my fellow believers. ๐Ÿ˜‰

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I suppose this is similar to what Paul said about some Christians observing certain days to the Lord, and others not, also to the Lord. I would hope each side is trying to be faithful to what we believe Christ is saying. The Lord knows the heart.