Bitcoiners talk a lot about low time preference and high time preference thinking.

I would argue that while plenty of bitcoin maximalists consider themselves as having a low time preference, the majority of their discussion is actually high time preference thinking, ending with hyper bitcoinization, and the assumption the world will continue to work as is with bitcoin as the money.

I’m curious if that is actually true, or what will in fact change as a result of such events. Many comment about how the military industrial complex will not be able to afford perpetual war, but not about what the military will be able to afford.

Seldom do I hear discussions within the bitcoin community about the post hyper-bitcoinization world and how it will operate effectively with bitcoin at the base layer. Majority of discussions end at hyper-bitcoinization as if that is the end goal.

Consider hyper-bitcoinization as a given.

How many satoshis will the US Mail service charge for a single stamp?

What will it cost in satoshis to mine metals, create steel, manufacture refineries, refine oil?

What would the average salary of a McDonald’s owner be in satoshis? What will the robots cost that make the hamburgers

What about an AI developer?

Answering these questions will allow the value for value economy to understand its position relative to the future, and understand the arbitrage of time within bitcoin history.