Replying to Avatar fiatjaf

nostr:nprofile1qqsza7flq8xjfylqgg66dwrmzrfuff6w9flt0s72795zdrm27ue3fdgct4s0j is this because you don't think it's wise for a weird Cobol-like string of instructions -- that first have to be generated by the host (with all the care to prevent malicious injections and all the refinement of string concatenation otherwise) and then parsed by the database -- to act as the API between two programs because they could pretty exchange structured data instead?

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqpxfgpzqwlsccluhy6xxsr6l9a9uhhxf75g85g8a709tprjcn4e42h053vaqyd8wumn8ghj7mr0vd4kymmc9enxjct5dfskvtnrdakj7qg6waehxw309ac8junpd45kgtnxd9shg6npvchxxmmd9uq3kamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwajhxar9wfhxyarr9e3k7mf0qqsxz55wldnzvvwsudlgrusqwpwxcar8x9625zmrgvpykhe9fwn4jdg5tvfqt

Dynamically compiling SQL query strings in our programs is something so stupid even southpark couldn't sufficiently mock it

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

South Park talked about SQL? Where?

It's ripe for the pickings

This is what I think devs look like when they are writing SQL abstraction libraries.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHOA6p8R_kE