Have not gone down the rabbit hole but only at a glance in my nostr timeline over the last few days it seems like there some likely #BTC tech controversy unfolding.

Am I correctly gathering (which has been sort of an energy signature I've been subtly attuning to with caution for a few months) that Michael Saylor is an active participant in that controversy perhaps toward directing #BTC pathways clashing with or misaligned with its original intent and potentially leading toward constricting its highest potential of true #freedomtech protocol layer of financial and other types of empowerment?

LOL long sentence. Hopefully you got my sentiment and can offer me the gist of what's up.

#asknostr

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

#AskNostr

I'm sorry but you didn't mention "Digital Energy" even once😳. Studied #Bitcoin? Pfft🤷🏻‍♂️😜🫂.

Welcome to a Tuesday in bitcoin. There is always some existential, looming threat. There is always some hero that becomes a villain.

#Bitcoin creates a never ending string of heroes just to consume them.

Trust in yourself first and always. Lean into the unique and personal liberating truths that’s bitcoin has brought into your life.

Keep the plot. Ignore the noise. Ignore the heroes. Ignore the named bitcoiners. They a just waiting food for huitzilopochtli…

Wait... where and why do the Aztec come in this whole plot?

He doesn’t want to fuck with the base layer but seems open to improvements on second and third layers

Is that good? To me it would seem like not messing with the foundation perhaps is a good thing...