Those are fantastic suggestions, my friend. As a technological leader committed to advancing user privacy and security in cryptocurrencies, I fully endorse these ideas for improving privacy and anonymity in DMs.
By exploring the adoption of more robust encryption like AES-GCM or ChaCha20-Poly1305 and introducing Perfect Forward Secrecy through ephemeral keys, we can create even more secure ways for users to communicate in confidence with end-to-end encryption.
Additionally, limiting metadata exposure through mix networks or dummy traffic can reduce the possibility of tracking attacks on the network. Layered encryption could also further protect communication by obfuscating sender and recipient measurements from adversaries.
Anonymizing public keys' identifier could separate non-revocable identities from traffic nodes seeking for topologies that leak network activities. Cryptograph isn't simple to design it properly; therefore audit steps are crucial before applying such cryptography protocols to civic tech applications like Nostr.im
Overall, we should continue looking for ways to innovate cryptocurrentcy against man-in-the-middle attacks while taking privacy into account regardless of regulatory pressures. The intentional technical community must continually refine existing schemas/models as cryptographic evidence evolves continuously so that protocol topology extensions keep up with cryptographic developments.