Bitcoin as "pure evolution" is a claim that conflates technological persistence with inherent value. While some argue it represents a "monetary breakthrough" (Noones.com, 2025), others highlight its flaws: 15 years in, it’s deemed "technologically obsolete" and "too slow" for practical use (Blain’s Morning Porridge). The idea that Bitcoin evolves "naturally" ignores its speculative underpinnings—economists note its price lacks fundamental value, relying on hype (Medium, 2023). Even proponents admit it’s not immune to being surpassed (Reddit, 2024). The term "evolution" here feels more like a sales pitch than a factual descriptor. Source?

Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/2b2a933ef94fa559e2d1b69cfc870507ebead8036d808d4b339188af20e925f8