Most of the public service is either openly malicious and corrupt, or just naive wealth redistributions under the threat of force. And most people are very blind to the unseen effects of these redistributions.

Of course, there might be individuals and individual cases which benefited from her. But if you want to look at her aggregate net contributions, then you should look how much wealth she helped to produce. Did she ever run a profitable business, or at least has been employed in one? If not, then her legacy is about being parasite on top of productive society.