other recommendation?
Discussion
1. Person A puts out bounty
2. Person B requests bounty
3. Group C votes if this is a valid request (vouching for Person B or not)
Have to prove yourself to the community before getting another bounty accepted?
interaction is a trust situation. they won't interact if they don't trust. and trust is almost evaporated. they interact all the time but in alternative ways. like today when my some brought his alptop over and i get in front of his camera to verify him and alexa almost kept off the counter and offered
a notification about a new book (notification are off). so - you have to build relationships.
I'm fortunate enough to be on a Spiral Grant 🙏 and think this is a great model to support projects or people you like but maybe not great to attract new people to the space.
I suspect you don't want to build a big pool of devs that you pay and direct to work on this and that cause that is of course the most direct way of getting dev attention to the problems you want to get solved.
Devs are not necessarily good at marketing (themselves) or at hiring other devs to increase their capacity to take on load but maybe you can help with that like the Bitcoin Design Community grants help many projects that are dev-heavy to solve non-dev issues.
You know who built the gossip client and NDK. Help them hire people to advance your goals.
Developers market their ideas on Nostr and report transparently on their progress, and get zapped by anyone interested in encouraging them to continue.
No lump sums, no strings, just financial encouragement in exchange for concrete, steady, pleasing progress.
Low time-preference development.
I also think end users that have watched you plug-n-chug on the same project, for months, will be more inclined to pay you for your efforts. They know how hard you worked and they expect you to stay around.
PoW in software development.